IN RE WELFARE OF X.T.

No. 43507-1-II.

300 P.3d 824 (2013)

174 Wn. App. 733

In re the WELFARE OF X.T., A Minor Child.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

Publication Ordered May 7, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine E. Glinski , Attorney at Law, Manchester, WA, for Appellant.

Julian McFarland Bray , Office of the Attorney General, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

QUINN-BRINTNALL, PENOYAR, BJORGEN, JJ.


PENOYAR, J.

¶ 1 JT is the father of XT, born April 8, 2011. He appeals the juvenile court's order finding XT to be a dependent child, arguing that the Department of Social and Health Services (Department) failed to present sufficient evidence that XT is a dependent child because the Department's evidence was primarily inadmissible hearsay. JT contends that the juvenile court erred by considering hearsay evidence and, consequently, that substantial evidence does...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases