1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 295 P.3d
  5. 295 P.3d 800 (2013)
 

DOUGLAS v. VISSER

No. 67242-8-1.

295 P.3d 800 (2013)

Nigel and Kathleen DOUGLAS, and the marital community thereof, Respondents, v. Terry VISSER and Diane Visser, and the marital community thereof, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

February 25, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory Earl Thulin , Attorney at Law, Bellingham, WA, for Appellants.

Philip James Buri , Buri Funston Mumford PLLC, Bellingham, WA, for Respondents.

APPELWICK, J.

¶ 11 When prospective homebuyers discover evidence of a defect, the buyers must beware. They are on notice of the defect and have a duty to make further inquiries. Prior to listing a house for sale, the Vissers made superficial repairs that concealed significant rot damage and made no disclosure of the defect to the buyers. During a prepurchase inspection, the Douglases discovered areas of rot but nevertheless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases