1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 295 P.3d
  5. 295 P.3d 305 (2013)
 

DANA v. PIPER

No. 42290-5-II.

295 P.3d 305 (2013)

Troy DANA and Pamela Dana, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. Rick PIPER and "Jane Doe" Piper, husband and wife; Piper Group International, LLC; and Sussman Shank, LLP; John McCormick and "Jane Doe" McCormick, husband and wife; Dallas Thomsen and "Jane Doe" Thomsen, husband and wife; Doe Defendants I through X, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

February 20, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon Emmett Cushman , Attorney at Law, Kevin Hochhalter , Cushman Law Offices, Olympia, WA, for Petitioners.

David S. Foster , Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, Patrick N. Rothwell , Davis Rothwell Earle & Xochihua PC, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

WORSWICK, C.J.

¶ 1 In their legal malpractice case against Sussman Shank LLP, Troy and Pamela Dana seek review of five pretrial discovery orders. Dana1 argues that the trial court erred by (1) ruling that Dana impliedly waived the attorney-client privilege, (2) disqualifying Dana's counsel and their entire law firm, and (3) finding facts the record does not support. Because the trial court erred in ruling that Dana waived the attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases