1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 295 P.3d
  5. 295 P.3d 231 (2013)
 

HUMPHREY IND. v. CLAY STREET ASSOCIATES

No. 86643-1.

295 P.3d 231 (2013)

176 Wn.2d 662

HUMPHREY INDUSTRIES, LTD., Appellant, v. CLAY STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC; 615 Commerce; Clay Associates Phase II LLC; Scott Rogel; Lori Goldfarb; Joseph Rogel and Lee Ann Rogel, husband and wife; ABO Investments; and Avram Investments, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided February 14, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Christopher Spellman , Stanton Phillip Beck , Andrew J. Gabel , Lane Powell PC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Gregory J. Hollon , Barbara Himes Schuknecht , McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren, Alan B. Bornstein , Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

GONZÁLEZ, J.

¶ 1 This case concerns attorney fees under the dissenters' rights provisions of the Washington Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act), chapter 25.15 RCW. We first considered this dispute two years ago when we reversed the award of attorney fees imposed on Humphrey Industries Ltd. (Humphrey) and remanded to the trial court to reconsider an award of attorney fees in Humphrey's favor. On remand, the trial court awarded

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases