WOLFE v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP.

No. 42636-6-II.

293 P.3d 1244 (2013)

173 Wn. App. 302

Charles and Janice WOLFE, husband and wife; John and Dee Anttonen, husband and wife, Appellants, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

January 29, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen T. Miller , Law Offices of Allen T. Miller, PLLC, Olympia, WA, for Appellants.

Amanda G. Phily , Office of the Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for Respondents.


HUNT, P.J.

¶ 1 Charles and Janice Wolfe and John and Dee Anttonen appeal the superior court's summary judgment dismissal with prejudice of their nuisance, negligence, and inverse condemnation claims against the Washington State Department of Transportation (DOT). The Wolfes and the Anttonens argue that the superior court erred in granting summary judgment to the DOT because issues of fact exist concerning each of their claims and exceptions to the public duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases