1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 285 P.3d
  5. 285 P.3d 187 (2012)
 

JOY v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES

No. 42118-6-II.

285 P.3d 187 (2012)

Cheryl D. JOY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

September 11, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frances R. Hamrick , Douglas Maclean Palmer , Busick Hamrick PLLC, Vancouver, WA, for Appellant.

Anastasia R. Sandstrom , Attorney General's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

William D. Hochberg , Attorney at Law, Rachel vs Hamar , Law Office of William D. Hochberg, Edmonds, WA, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington State Labor Council.

VAN DEREN J.

¶ 1 Cheryl Joy appeals the trial court's order granting judgment as a matter of law1 to the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L & I). She argues that the trial court erred in concluding that RCW 70.14.120(3)2 precludes a court's determination that spinal cord stimulation was a medically necessary and proper treatment in her case.3 We hold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases