1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 272 P.3d
  5. 272 P.3d 273 (2012)
 

RUSSELL v. MAAS

No. 65523-0-I.

272 P.3d 273 (2012)

166 Wn. App. 885

Robert RUSSELL, an individual, Respondent, v. Debra Lynn MAAS, Appellant, and Does 1 through 10; Roe Companies XI through XX, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 5, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marilee Erickson , Pamela A. Okano , Reed McClure , Michael W. Smart , Lee Smart , Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Brian K. Boddy , Attorney at Law, Kirkland, WA, for Respondent.

BECKER, J.

¶ 1 Under Mandatory Arbitration Rule 7.1(a), only an "aggrieved party" may appeal an arbitration award through a request for trial de novo. This requirement is satisfied when an attorney files a request for trial de novo on behalf of an aggrieved client.

¶ 2 The issue presented by this appeal arose when an arbitrator found in favor of Robert Russell, plaintiff in a personal injury suit. Counsel for defendant Debra Maas filed a request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases