SARGENT v. SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT

No. 65896-4-I.

260 P.3d 1006 (2011)

Evan SARGENT, Respondent/Cross Appellant, v. SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellant/Cross Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

September 19, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary T. Smith , Seattle City Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Greg Overstreet , Allied Law Group, Olympia, WA, Patrick Preston , Thomas M. Brennan , McKay Chadwell, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Ramsey E. Ramerman , City of Everett, Everett, WA, for Amicus Curiae Association of Municipal Attorneys.


ELLINGTON, J.

¶ 1 This case is brought under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW. The chief issue is whether a request for public records has indefinite effect, such that after an agency has responded to a request, it must monitor the status of all records within the request and disclose any that later become subject to disclosure. We must also decide whether the categorical exemption for records of an open and active law enforcement investigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases