NATIONAL SUR. CORP. v. IMMUNEX CORP.

No. 64712-1-I.

256 P.3d 439 (2011)

162 Wn. App. 762

NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, Respondent/Cross Appellant, v. IMMUNEX CORPORATION, Appellant/Cross Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

July 25, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Richard Murray , Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Washington, DC, Cameron H. Faber , Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Linda D. Kornfeld , Damon A. Thayer , Jenner & Block LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Jerret E. Sale , Deborah Lynn Carstens , Matthew J. Sekits , Bullivant Houser Bailey PC, Catherine Wright Smith , Smith Goodfriend PS, Seattle, WA, Ronald J. Clark , Bullivant Houser Bailey PC, Portland, OR, for Respondent/Cross-Appellant.


APPELWICK, J.

¶ 1 Immunex challenges the trial court ruling that National Surety does not have a duty to defend in several lawsuits challenging Immunex's use of an inflated average wholesale price. National Surety cross appeals the trial court's order that it compensate Immunex for defense costs until the time of the court's ruling on the duty to defend unless it can show prejudice at trial. We affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2 Immunex

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases