1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 257 P.3d
  5. 257 P.3d 599 (2011)
 

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST VAN CAMP

No. 200,811-9.

257 P.3d 599 (2011)

171 Wash.2d 781

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST W. Russell VAN CAMP, an Attorney at Law.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided June 16, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dustin Douglass Deissner , Van Camp & Deissner, Spokane, WA, for Petitioner.

Joanne S. Abelson , Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

C. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 This attorney discipline case focuses on an ambiguous written fee agreement, the representation provided in the litigation, and the attorney's conduct during the grievance investigation. Attorney W. Russell Van Camp required a $25,000 initial "retainer" fee to represent a client in an injunction suit, but he did not explain to the client whether it was a nonrefundable flat fee, an hourly fee, or something else. Nor did the fee agreement Van...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases