CITY OF LAKEWOOD v. KOENIG

No. 38657-7-II.

250 P.3d 113 (2011)

CITY OF LAKEWOOD, Respondent, v. David KOENIG, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 29, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William John Crittenden , Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Matthew S. Kaser , City of Lakewood, Lakewood, WA, for Respondent.

Michele Lynn Earl-Hubbard , Christopher Roslaniec, Allied Law Group LLC, David M. Norman , Lee Smart P.S., Inc., Seattle, WA, amicus counsel for Allied Daily Newspapers of Washington.


WORSWICK, A.C.J.

¶ 1 David Koenig appeals the trial court's order compelling discovery. He argues that an agency is not entitled to discovery under the Public Records Act (PRA) and that if an agency is entitled to discovery, the City of Lakewood's (City) discovery was not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible relevant evidence. We hold that, although an agency is entitled to discovery under the PRA, the interrogatory and request for production...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases