STATE v. KINTZ

Nos. 81688-3, 81689-1.

238 P.3d 470 (2010)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Clarence Andrew KINTZ, aka Chuck Kintz, Petitioner. State of Washington, Respondent, v. Clarence Andrew Kintz, aka Chuck Kintz, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided August 26, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Matthew Dunn, Law Offices of Michael K. Tasker, Bellingham, WA, for Petitioner.

Eric John Richey, Hilary A. Thomas, Kimberly Anne Thulin, Whatcom County Prosecutor's Office, Philip James Buri, Buri Funston Mumford, P.L.L.C., Bellingham, WA, for Respondent.


ALEXANDER, J.

¶ 1 Clarence Kintz obtained review of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming his convictions in Whatcom County Superior Court on two charges of stalking. Kintz contends that the Court of Appeals erred by affirming the trial court's interpretation of the term "separate occasions," which appears in the stalking statute, RCW 9A.46.110. He also contends that the Court of Appeals incorrectly determined that sufficient evidence was presented at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases