IN RE DETENTION OF MULKINS

No. 63222-1-I.

237 P.3d 342 (2010)

In the Matter of the DETENTION OF Christopher MULKINS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

August 9, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lila J. Silverstein, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

David J.W. Hackett, King County Prosecutors Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.


GROSSE, J.

¶ 1 A respondent in a sexually violent predator (SVP) proceeding is not entitled to present evidence that he or she may be eligible to participate in the Community Protection Program (CPP) unless the evidence establishes that this option would in fact exist for the respondent as a placement condition or voluntary treatment option upon an unconditional release. Here, the respondent failed to show that he was actually accepted into and agreed to participate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases