SUQUAMISH TRIBE v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND

No. 39017-5-II.

235 P.3d 812 (2010)

The SUQUAMISH TRIBE, Kitsap Citizens for Rural Preservation, Jerry Harless, and The Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Appellants, v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, State Agency Respondent, Additional Party from underlying Agency Case: Kitsap County, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

July 7, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melody L. Allen, Suquamish Tribe, Office of Tribal Attorney, Suquamish, WA, David Alan Bricklin, Bricklin & Newman, LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Jerry Harless, Port Orchard, WA, pro se.

Shelley E. Kneip, Lisa J. Nickel, Kitsap County Prosecutors Office, Port Orchard, WA, Jerald R. Anderson, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.

Charles Edward Maduell, Clayton Paul Graham, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Olympic Property Group.


VAN DEREN, C.J.

¶ 1 The Suquamish Tribe, Kitsap Citizens for Rural Preservation, and Jerry Harless1 appeal the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (Board) decisions validating Kitsap County's (County) comprehensive plan under Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW. The Citizens argue that the Board erred because (1) it applied bright line rules to approve minimum urban density and maximum rural...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases