1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 230 P.3d
  5. 230 P.3d 1063 (2010)
 

STATE v. WRIGHT

No. 62142-4-I.

230 P.3d 1063 (2010)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Roger Sinclair WRIGHT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

April 19, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Hansen, Ariella Wagonfeld, Allen Hansen & Maybrown PS, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Stephen Hobbs, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

SCHINDLER, J.

¶ 1 In an unpublished opinion, we rejected Roger Sinclair Wright's argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the officer lacked justification to stop him for a traffic infraction or that the traffic stop was a pretext, and affirmed his convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA a/k/a "Ecstasy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases