1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 230 P.3d
  5. 230 P.3d 162 (2010)
 

MERRIMAN v. COKELEY

No. 83700-7.

230 P.3d 162 (2010)

Scott MERRIMAN and Kim Merriman, husband and wife, Respondents, v. Paul COKELEY and Dianne Cokeley, husband and wife, Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided April 8, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Kinney Valz, Jr., Valz Houser Kogut & Barnes, P.S., Olympia, WA, for Petitioners.

Thomas F. Miller, Attorney at Law, Tumwater, WA, Jay Allan Goldstein, Carmen R. Rowe Hoogkamer, Jay A. Goldstein Law Office, P.L.L.C., Olympia, WA, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 Paul and Dianne Cokeley seek review of a Court of Appeals decision holding that Scott and Kim Merriman sufficiently proved a clear and well-defined boundary between the parties' properties sufficient to establish the boundary by mutual recognition and acquiescence. Because we agree with the trial court that the Merrimans failed to prove a clear and well-defined boundary by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, we grant review, reverse the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases