IN RE WRATHALL

No. 63143-8-I.

232 P.3d 569 (2010)

In the Matter of the Detention of David WRATHALL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered May 19, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Casey Grannis, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

David Hackett, King County Pros. Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.


ELLINGTON, J.

¶ 1 Sexually violent predator David Wrathall appeals the revocation of his placement in a less restrictive alternative. He contends due process requires the court to find he willfully violated the conditions of that placement before it can order revocation. Because the revocation was based upon Wrathall's failure to comply with conditions necessary to ensure public safety, we disagree and affirm the revocation.

BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases