EAKINS v. HUBER

No. 27357-1-III.

225 P.3d 1041 (2010)

Sheri L. EAKINS, a single woman, Appellant, v. Dr. Phil HUBER and Jane Doe Huber, a married couple, and Spokane Cardiology, P.S., a Washington State Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

February 23, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dustin Douglass Deissner, Van Camp & Deissner, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Robert F. Sestero II, Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S., Spokane, WA, Mary H. Spillane, William Kastner & Gibbs, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.


KULIK, C.J.

¶ 1 Sheri Eakins appeals the trial court's summary judgment dismissal of her medical malpractice claim against Dr. Philip Huber and Spokane Cardiology, P.S. She contends the trial court erred by concluding that her proffered medical causation evidence failed to meet the standard set forth in Frye v. United States, 54 App.D.C. 46, 293 F. 1013 (1923). Ms. Eakins alleges that the stents containing nickel placed in her coronary artery caused a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases