WEISS v. LONNQUIST

No. 62754-6-I.

224 P.3d 787 (2009)

153 Wash.App. 502

Reba WEISS, a single person, Respondent, v. Judith A. LONNQUIST, a single person, and Law Offices of Judith A. Lonnquist, P.S. a Washington professional services corporation, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

December 14, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth L. Van Moppes, Law Offices of Elizabeth Van Moppes, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Judith A. Lonnquist, Law Offices of Judith A. Lonnquist, P.S., Seattle, WA, pro se.

Robert B. Gould, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.


DWYER, A.C.J.

¶ 1 Where a fixed term employment contract expires and the employee continues to render the same services provided under the previous agreement, a court will presume that the employee is serving under a new, implied contract having the same terms and conditions as contained in the expired contract. However, where it is clear that the implied contract does not have the same terms and conditions as the earlier agreement, there is no basis to presume...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases