1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 209 P.3d
  5. 209 P.3d 534 (2009)
 

STANZEL v. CITY OF PUYALLUP

No. 37697-1-II.

209 P.3d 534 (2009)

Michael STANZEL, Respondent, Pierce County, a political subdivision, Respondent, v. CITY OF PUYALLUP, a municipal corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

June 16, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin John Yamamoto, City of Puyallup, Puyallup, WA, for Appellant.

David Brian St. Pierre, Pierce County Office of Prosecuting Attorney—Civil, Tacoma, WA, J. Richard Aramburu, Aramburu & Eustis LLP, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

BRIDGEWATER, P.J.

¶ 1 The city of Puyallup (City) appeals the Pierce County Superior Court's denial of its motion to dismiss Michael Stanzel's land-use petition for failure to first exhaust his administrative remedies. The City further challenges the Pierce County Superior Court's determination that the Pierce County hearing examiner had authority to order the City to provide water service and a water service availability letter to Stanzel. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases