STATE v. MENESES

No. 61118-6-I.

205 P.3d 916 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Andre Toi MENESES, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

April 13, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth McNeely Albertson, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Andre Toi Meneses, pro se.

Erin S. Norgaard, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.


GROSSE, J.

¶ 1 To ensure that the State is held to its burden of proving a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, jury instructions must include every essential element of the charged crime(s). Telephone harassment requires that the defendant possess, at the time of initiating the telephone call, the intent to harass or threaten. Here, the jury instructions properly conveyed that temporal element. Meneses raises numerous other issues on appeal, including...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases