1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 201 P.3d
  5. 201 P.3d 389 (2009)
 

STATE v. WOFFORD

No. 36444-1-II.

201 P.3d 389 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Donald Anainise WOFFORD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

February 18, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Jonathan Michael Palmer, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

PART PUBLISHED OPINION

ARMSTRONG, J.

¶ 1 Donald Anainise Wofford appeals his conviction of violating a domestic violence no-contact order. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, arguing that the State failed to prove that his conduct was a crime under former RCW 26.50.110(1) (2006) and that he had previous convictions that elevated the crime to a felony under RCW 26.50.110(5).1 Finding no reversible error, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases