1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 202 P.3d
  5. 202 P.3d 351 (2009)
 

STATE v. KING

No. 26695-8-III.

202 P.3d 351 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Anthony Lamar KING, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

February 26, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan Marie Gasch, Gasch Law Office, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Mark Erik Lindsey, Andrew J. Metts, III, Spokane County Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

¶ 1 The appellant here challenges the authority of a sentencing court to run the sentence for his current conviction (witness intimidation) consecutively to a sentence he was already serving for drug possession. We conclude that the court had the authority to run the sentence for the current crime consecutively to the sentence he was already serving. And we, therefore, affirm the sentence.

FACTS

¶ 2 Deputy Sheriff Michael McNees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases