1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 201 P.3d
  5. 201 P.3d 361 (2009)
 

STATE v. C.A.E.

No. 36739-4-II.

201 P.3d 361 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Appellant, v. C.A.E., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

February 10, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd Layton Dowell, Kitsap County Prosecutor's Office, Port Orchard, WA, for Appellant.

David Gene `arthur' Wecker, Attorney at Law, Port Orchard, WA, Brett Andrews Purtzer, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

HOUGHTON, P.J.

¶ 1 The State appeals a trial court's restitution order based on a juvenile adjudication of guilt.1 The State argues that the trial court improperly excluded the costs of unperformed but anticipated medical procedures because it misconstrued the restitution definition under RCW 13.40.020(22)2 and misapplied the prevailing case law. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases