1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 215 A.3d
  5. 215 A.3d 1094 (2019)
 

STATE v. HAYNES

Nos. 19-006, 19-009 & 19-010.

215 A.3d 1094 (2019)

2019 VT 44

STATE of Vermont v. Wesley HAYNES, Tristan Harris and Dennis Magoon.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

June 28, 2019.

As Amended July 9, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Tartter , Deputy State's Attorney, Montpelier, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew Valerio , Defender General, and Rebecca Turner , Appellate Defender, Montpelier, for Defendant-Appellant Haynes, Allison Fulcher, Barre, for Defendant-Appellant Harris, and Michael Rose, St. Albans, for Defendant-Appellant Magoon.

PRESENT: Reiber, C.J., Skoglund, Robinson, Eaton and Carroll, JJ.

¶ 1. Defendants move to reconsider this Court's dismissal of their interlocutory appeals because defendants had not demonstrated why they could not seek review by entering a conditional guilty plea. Defendants argue that they should not be required to enter a conditional guilty plea instead of seeking interlocutory review. We agree and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases