MANNING v. SCHULTZ

No. 12-121.

93 A.3d 566 (2014)

2014 VT 22

Pauline MANNING v. Michael SCHULTZ.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

February 21, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary G. Kirkpatrick of Kirkpatrick & Goldsborough, PLLC, South Burlington, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Susan M. Murray of Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP, Burlington, for Defendant-Appellant.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ., and BENT, Supr. J., Specially Assigned.


BURGESS, J.

¶ 1. The principal question presented in this appeal from a final judgment of divorce is whether, as husband contends, the trial court erred in its division of the marital estate by including an offset for the disparity in value between the parties' projected Social Security retirement benefits. We conclude that this was error, and therefore reverse and remand.

¶ 2. The facts may be summarized as follows. The parties were married in 1992...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases