1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 86 A.3d
  5. 86 A.3d 981 (2013)
 

STATE v. GREEN MOUNTAIN FUTURE

No. 12-072.

86 A.3d 981 (2013)

2013 VT 87

STATE of Vermont v. GREEN MOUNTAIN FUTURE.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

September 27, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Sorrell , Attorney General, and Eve Jacobs-Carnahan and Megan J. Shafritz , Assistant Attorneys General, Montpelier, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Joshua R. Diamond of Diamond & Robinson, P.C., Montpelier, and James Lamb of Sandler, Reiff, Young & Lamb, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ., and COHEN, SUPR. J., Specially Assigned.

DOOLEY, J.

¶ 1. Appellant Green Mountain Future (GMF) appeals the summary judgment decision of the trial court finding that it is a political action committee (PAC) and violated a number of provisions of the Vermont campaign finance laws. GMF maintains that the trial court erred in not applying a narrowing construction created by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1976 case of Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 96 S.Ct. 612, 46 L...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases