1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 70 A.3d
  5. 70 A.3d 935 (2013)
 

IN RE STOWE HIGHLANDS MERGER/SUBDIVISION

No. 12-100.

70 A.3d 935 (2013)

2013 VT 4

In re STOWE HIGHLANDS MERGER/SUBDIVISION APPLICATION.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

January 11, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leighton C. Detora, Pro Se, Barre, Appellant.

Amanda S.E. Lafferty of Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C., Burlington, for Appellant Town of Stowe.

Harold B. Stevens of Stevens Law Office, Stowe, for Appellee.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, SKOGLUND, BURGESS and ROBINSON, JJ.

BURGESS, J.

¶ 1. This appeal stems from the latest litigation involving developer Stowe Highlands and its Resort Planned Unit Development (PUD) in the Town of Stowe. The Stowe Development Review Board (DRB) denied Stowe Highlands' application to amend the PUD by subdividing and then merging certain lots, including one designated for a hotel. The DRB concluded that the amendment amounted to a change in the permit conditions and that such amendment was not warranted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases