1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 59 A.3d
  5. 59 A.3d 730 (2012)
 

IN RE RUMSEY

No. 11-356.

59 A.3d 730 (2012)

2012 VT 74

In re Appeal of Charlotte RUMSEY.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

August 31, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Dysart , Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., Burlington, for Petitioner-Appellant.

William H. Sorrell , Attorney General, Montpelier, and Christina Byrom , Assistant Attorney General, Waterbury, for Respondent-Appellee.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, SKOGLUND, BURGESS and ROBINSON, JJ.

DOOLEY, J.

¶ 1. Petitioner Charlotte Rumsey appeals from a decision of the Vermont Human Services Board denying her Choices for Care (CFC) Services on a tie vote of the Board. The issue before the Board was whether petitioner met the eligibility requirements for either highest need or high need services. We hold that the Board decision fails to meet the requirements of the authorizing statute and was not a decision under 1 V.S.A. § 172. Accordingly, we reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases