1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 48 A.3d
  5. 48 A.3d 568 (2012)
 

RUTLAND HERALD v. CITY OF RUTLAND

No. 10-344.

48 A.3d 568 (2012)

2012 VT 26

RUTLAND HERALD v. CITY OF RUTLAND and AFSCME Council 93, Local 1201.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

April 6, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Hemley and Matthew B. Byrne of Gravel and Shea, Burlington, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Andrew Costello , Office of the City Attorney, Rutland, for Defendant-Appellant.

Michael Blair , Rutland, for Intervenor-Appellant AFSCME Council 93, Local 1201.

William H. Sorrell , Attorney General, and Mark J. Di Stefano , Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Amicus Curiae State of Vermont.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ.

REIBER, C.J.

¶ 1. In this case, we again confront the proper scope of the investigatory records exemption under the Vermont Access to Public Records Act (PRA), 1 V.S.A. § 317(c)(5). At issue are documents that relate to the investigation and discipline of City of Rutland employees for viewing pornography, including possible child pornography, at work. The City challenges a superior court order requiring it to disclose certain documents to plaintiff Rutland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases