1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 27 A.3d
  5. 27 A.3d 1078 (2011)
 

IN RE SHENANDOAH LLC

No. 09-388.

27 A.3d 1078 (2011)

2011 VT 68

In re SHENANDOAH LLC, et al. (Appeal of Act 250 JO # 9-066).

Supreme Court of Vermont.

July 1, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Shlansky of Shlansky & Co., LLP, Vergennes, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

William H. Sorrell , Attorney General, and Scot L. Kline and Nicholas F. Persampieri , Assistant Attorneys General, Montpelier, for Amicus Curiae State of Vermont.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ., and EATON, Supr. J., Specially Assigned.

BURGESS, J.

¶ 1. Shenandoah, LLC, David Shlansky, Ting Chang, and other entities and individuals appeal from the Environmental Court's summary judgment decision upholding an Act 250 jurisdictional opinion. They challenge the court's attribution of certain development and subdivision activities to Shlansky and Chang. Appellants also argue that "person-based jurisdiction" under Act 250 violates the Vermont Constitution. Appellants failed to preserve their constitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases