1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 22 A.3d
  5. 22 A.3d 461 (2011)
 

IN RE FINK

No. 10-164.

22 A.3d 461 (2011)

2011 VT 42

In re Melvin FINK, Esq.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

April 15, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beth DeBernardi , Deputy Disciplinary Counsel, Burlington, for Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Melvin Fink , Pro Se, Ludlow, Respondent-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Present: DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ., and GREARSON, Supr. J., Specially Assigned.

JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1. A panel of the Professional Responsibility Board concluded that respondent violated Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5(c) and 8.4(a) for failing to put a contingent fee agreement in writing and for attempting to charge an unreasonable fee. The panel recommended that respondent be publicly reprimanded and placed on probation. We elected to review that determination on our own motion. In this Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases