Opinion by Justice LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR.
We consider these two appeals together because they present two different applications of the provision in Code § 8.01-384(A) that addresses the absence of a contemporaneous objection when there is no opportunity to make a timely objection.
In each case, we consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of issues on appeal when the litigant had failed to make a contemporaneous...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.