1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 506 P.3d
  5. 506 P.3d 1204 (2022)
 

RASER TECH. v. LYNCH, FENNER & SMITH INC.

No. 20200941-CA.

506 P.3d 1204 (2022)

2022 UT App 20

RASER TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC., et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Anderson , Salt Lake City, L. Rich Humpherys , Karra J. Porter , Salt Lake City, Paul T. Moxley , Patrick E. Johnson , James W. Christian , and Alan M. Pollack , New York, NY, and Stephen Quesenberry , Attorneys for Appellants.

James S. Jardine , Mark W. Pugsley , Carol Ann Funk , Salt Lake City, Richard C. Pepperman II , John G. McCarthy , Andrew J. Frackman , and Abby F. Rudzin , New York, NY, Attorneys for Appellees.

Judge David N. Mortensen authored this Opinion, in which Judges Diana Hagen and Ryan D. Tenney concurred.

Opinion

¶1 Raser Technologies Inc. (Raser) claims that the district court erred when it determined Raser's racketeering claims against Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. (Merrill Lynch) were barred under the doctrine of res judicata based on a final judgment rendered by a Georgia court. Seeing no error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases