PEAD v. EPHRAIM CITY

No. 20190416-CA.

473 P.3d 175 (2020)

2020 UT App 113

Darren PEAD, Appellee, v. EPHRAIM CITY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

Filed August 6, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan R. Skeen , Maralyn M. English , and Nathanael J. Mitchell , Salt Lake City, Attorneys for Appellant.

Erik Strindberg , Salt Lake City, Kass Harstad , and Cameron Platt , Salt Lake City, Attorneys for Appellee.

Judge Jill M. Pohlman authored this Opinion, in which Judges Kate Appleby and Ryan M. Harris concurred.


Opinion

¶1 Ephraim City appeals the district court's denial of its motion to dismiss Darren Pead's complaint against it for violations of Utah's Whistleblower Act. The City argues that Pead's complaint is time-barred and that, in concluding otherwise, the district court erroneously calculated the applicable sixty-day...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases