¶ 1 Cameron Richardson appeals from convictions for rape and forcible anal sodomy. He claims error in his trial in the exclusion of evidence of the specific nature of his prior sexual relationship with the victim — evidence he claims was properly admissible under Utah Rule of Evidence 412(b)(2)(A). We agree. We hold that the trial court misconstrued this rule to incorporate a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
