STATE v. WRIGHT

No. 20090643-CA.

304 P.3d 887 (2013)

2013 UT App 142

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Justin George WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

June 20, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori J. Seppi , Attorney for Appellant.

John E. Swallow and Jeanne B. Inouye , Attorneys for Appellee.

Judge STEPHEN L. ROTH authored this Opinion, in which Judges GREGORY K. ORME and WILLIAM A. THORNE JR. concurred.


Opinion

ROTH, Judge:

¶ 1 Justin George Wright challenges his conviction for aggravated sexual abuse of a child on three grounds. First, Wright contends that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in investigating and presenting his defense. Wright next argues that the district court erred when it permitted the jury to hear inadmissible expert testimony. Finally, he asserts prosecutorial misconduct during closing statements. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases