BRADY v. PARK

No. 20110208-CA.

302 P.3d 1220 (2013)

2013 UT App 97

Don BRADY, Sinikka Brady, Don Brady Interior Design, and Finnish Touch Day Spa, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-appellants, v. Kang S. PARK, Bank of Utah, and Paul M. Halliday, Defendants, Appellants, and Cross-appellees.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

April 18, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Mansfield , Christine R. Poleshuk , and Nathan E. Wheatley , Attorneys for Appellants and Cross-appellees.

Clark R. Nielsen and Kathryn J. Steffey , Attorneys for Appellees and Cross-appellants.


Opinion

VOROS, Judge:

¶ 1 This is a dispute over a $675,000 promissory note. The note was amortized over thirty years, but a balloon payment was due in about ten years. Although Appellees (the Bradys) made every monthly payment for nearly ten years-albeit some late-Appellants (Park) won a judgment against them for more than $2.4 million.

¶ 2 On appeal, both parties contest the trial court's reading of the note. For different reasons, both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases