Decision
PER CURIAM.
¶ 1 Richard Menke appeals his conviction of burglary of a vehicle. Menke argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction and that the district court should have granted his motion for a directed verdict. We affirm.
¶ 2 We review the district court's denial of a motion for directed verdict for correctness. See State v. Hirschi, 2007 UT App 255, ¶ 15,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.