Decision
PER CURIAM:
¶ 1 Justin A. Epps appeals his conviction after a jury trial of violation of a protective order, a class A misdemeanor. We affirm.
¶ 2 Epps argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict, claiming that the State failed to present sufficient evidence that he was the person named in the protective order or that the place of business that Epps was restricted
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.