OROSCO v. CLINTON CITY

No. 20120013-CA.

292 P.3d 705 (2012)

2012 UT App 334

Fernando OROSCO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CLINTON CITY, Defendant and Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

November 29, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zane S. Froerer , Ogden, for Appellant.

David L. Church , Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before Judges DAVIS, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.


MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Judge.

¶ 1 Fernando Orosco appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Clinton City (the City), arguing that the trial court erroneously concluded that even if the continuing tort doctrine applied, Orosco's claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

¶ 2 "A challenge to a summary judgment presents solely a question of law that we review for correctness. We assess...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases