1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 272 P.3d
  5. 272 P.3d 799 (2012)
 

YORK v. PERFORMANCE AUTO, INC.

No. 20110908-CA.

272 P.3d 799 (2012)

2012 UT App 58

William YORK and Nathan York, Plaintiffs and Appellant, v. PERFORMANCE AUTO, INC.; James K. Slavens; and 10 John Does, Defendants and Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

February 24, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William York , Delta, Appellant Pro Se.

James K. Slavens , Fillmore, for Appellees.

Before Judges ORME, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

¶ 1 William York appeals the district court's September 7, 2011 order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. We affirm.

¶ 2 Rule 4(b)(i) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "[i]n an action commenced under Rule 3(a)(1), the summons together with a copy of the complaint shall be served no later than 120 days after the filing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases