1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 265 P.3d
  5. 265 P.3d 850 (2011)
 

SHOEMAKER v. SHOEMAKER

No. 20110598-CA.

265 P.3d 850 (2011)

2011 UT App 391

Paul David SHOEMAKER, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Dawn Marie SHOEMAKER, Respondent and Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

November 17, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul D. Shoemaker , Bountiful, Appellant Pro Se.

Fred W. Anderson , Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before Judges DAVIS, McHUGH, and ROTH.

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

¶ 1 Paul D. Shoemaker appeals the district court's August 2, 2011 order. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. We affirm.

¶ 2 Rule 10(e) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that if an appellant fails to present a substantial issue for appellate review, this court may summarily affirm the district court's decision. See Utah R.App. R. 10(e). The parties concede...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases