STICHTING MAYFLOWER v. DEPT. OF TRANSP.

No. 20110068-CA.

250 P.3d 1037 (2011)

2011 UT App 88

STICHTING MAYFLOWER MOUNTAIN FONDS; and Stichting Mayflower Recreations Fonds, Plaintiffs, Counterclaim Defendants, and Appellants, v. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff, and Appellee. Utah Department of Transportation, Counterclaim Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Robert W. Dunlap; Kathy L. Dunlap; United Park City Mines Company; Mayfinance, C.V.; and Cooperative Centrale Raiffenisen Boerenleenbank, B.A., Counterclaim Defendants and Appellees, v. Park City Municipal Corporation, Third-party Defendant and Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

March 24, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Craig Smay , Salt Lake City, for Appellants.

Mark R. Gaylord and Melanie J. Vartabedian , Salt Lake City, for Appellee Park City Municipal Corporation.

Before Judges DAVIS, VOROS, and CHRISTIANSEN.


DECISION

PER CURIAM:

¶ 1 Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds and Stichting Mayflower Recreations Fonds (collectively Stichting) seek to appeal the district court's November 29, 2010 order. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a final order.

¶ 2 Generally, "[a]n appeal is improper if it is taken from an order or judgment that is not final." Bradbury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases