1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 211 P.3d
  5. 211 P.3d 987 (2009)
 

BAHR v. IMUS

No. 20070933-CA.

211 P.3d 987 (2009)

2009 UT App 155

Rob BAHR, Sherri Bahr, and Ione Senn, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Jim IMUS and Melodee Imus, Defendants and Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

June 11, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jared L. Bramwell and Steven M. Kelly, Draper, for Appellants.

Robert J. Dale and Christian D. Austin, Salt Lake City, for Appellees.

Before Judges GREENWOOD, THORNE, and McHUGH.

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs Rob and Sherri Bahr and Ione Senn (collectively the Bahrs) appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Jim and Melodee Imus establishing the boundary line between the Bahrs' and Imuses' properties based on a theory of boundary by estoppel. Specifically, the Bahrs argue that summary judgment was inappropriate because there are material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases