STATE v. MOORE

No. 20070672-CA.

210 P.3d 967 (2009)

2009 UT App 128

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Arvin MOORE, Defendant and Appellant. Arvin Moore, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Sheriff Dave Edmunds, Respondent and Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

May 14, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randy B. Birch and Corey S. Zachman, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Jami R. Brackin, Coalville; and Paul R. Christensen and David R. Brickey, Park City, for Appellees.

Before Judges THORNE, DAVIS, and McHUGH.


OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

¶ 1 Arvin Moore appeals the denial of his Rule 65B Petition for Extraordinary Relief. See Utah R. Civ. P. 65B. Moore argues that he was denied sufficient due process while housed in the Summit County Jail (the Jail), awaiting sentencing on a criminal conviction. Specifically, Moore claims that the Jail failed to provide him with adequate notice, access to legal counsel, and the right to confront witnesses and present evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases