1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 210 P.3d
  5. 210 P.3d 962 (2009)
 

PITT v. TARON

No. 20080380-CA.

210 P.3d 962 (2009)

2009 UT App 113

Alan V. PITT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert TARON, Ray H. Dewsnup, Sally A. Dewsnup, et al., Defendants and Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

May 7, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Buhler, Grantsville, for Appellant.

Richard Tanner, Tooele, for Appellees.

Before Judges BENCH, ORME, and DAVIS.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 We do not reach Appellant Alan V. Pitt's challenges to the trial court's factual findings, including his claim that the trial "[c]ourt failed to define the requisite 20 year[] period it was considering" in its boundary by acquiescence and prescriptive easement rulings, because he failed to object to the adequacy of the factual findings below. Under the rule announced in 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases