1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 508 S.W.3d
  5. 508 S.W.3d 211 (2017)
 

KRAMER v. KASTLEMAN

NO. 14-1038.

508 S.W.3d 211 (2017)

Lisa KRAMER, f/k/a Lisa Kastleman, Petitioner, v. Bryan KASTLEMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

OPINION DELIVERED: January 27, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P. Webber , Law Offices of Joseph P. Webber, Wallace B. Jefferson , Rachel Anne Ekery , Alexander Dubose Jefferson & Townsend LLP, Austin TX, William Leslie Shireman , William B. Connolly , Connolly & Shireman, LLP, Houston TX, for Petitioner.

Craig T. Enoch , Enoch Kever PLLC, Robert D. Ettinger , Law Office of Robert D. Ettinger, Austin TX, for Respondent.

The acceptance-of-benefits doctrine precludes a litigant from challenging a judgment after voluntarily accepting the judgment's benefits: "A litigant cannot treat a judgment as both right and wrong."1 Applying this estoppel-based equitable doctrine,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases