1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 408 S.W.3d
  5. 408 S.W.3d 696 (2013)
 

TEXAS STATE BD. OF VETERINARY v. GIGGLEMAN

No. 03-12-00318-CV.

408 S.W.3d 696 (2013)

TEXAS STATE BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS, Appellant v. Gene GIGGLEMAN, DVM, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

August 22, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald A. Ferrill , Misty M. Pratt , Brown, Pruitt, Peterson & Wambsganss, P.C., Fort Worth, TX, for Appellee.

Bill Davis , Assistant Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Appellant.

Before Justices PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, and ROSE.

OPINION

BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.

The principal issue presented in this appeal, which arises from a mandamus suit brought by a requestor under the Texas Public Information Act (PIA),1 is whether the requestor "substantially prevailed," so as to qualify for an attorney's-fees award under the PIA,2 where he obtained an interlocutory summary judgment on his mandamus claim but that claim was ultimately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases