IN RE SUMMERSETT

No. 13-12-00431-CV.

438 S.W.3d 74 (2013)

In re James SUMMERSETT III.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg.

July 18, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patton G. Lochridge , McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, Austin, Jordan K. Mullins , Austin, for Relator.

Rodolfo Delgado , Judge, 93rd Dist. Court, Edinburg, Respondent.

Javier Pena , The Pena Law Firm, Edinburg, David H. Jones , Law Office of David H. Jones, McAllen, Rebecca Vela , Yzaguirre & Vela, PLLC, McAllen, Ricardo Pumarejo Jr. , Kittleman, Thomas & Gonzales, McAllen, for Real Party in Interest.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices GARZA and LONGORIA.


OPINION

Opinion by Chief Justice VALDEZ.

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, James Summersett III, seeks to compel the trial court to vacate its order mandating the production of documents. By two issues, Summersett contends that the trial court abused its discretion in compelling discovery because: (1) the documents at issue are not within his "possession, custody, or control" under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192.7(b); and (2) discovery was suspended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases